Guest Column: Creating Civic Solutions, Not Uncivilized Divisions
Patch reader Andrea Morissette Grazzini writes in about toxic political ideologies, the U.S. Constitution and interdependence.
Last year, Bill Moyers illuminated for me a critical relationship between civic leaders and citizens. Which comes to mind after President Barack Obama's recent State of the Union speech, that touched on similar themes.
Amid ever more divergent interpretations of the U.S. Constitution, I wondered aloud to Moyers if we should consider the document’s less disputed introductory statement. I’d barely finished asking when Moyers' reaction, captured in this video, crystallized a pivotal point.
The preamble to the Constitution “says the only way to survive in a civilization is for people to collaborate,” Moyers said. His clarity penetrated an ironic dissonance I've struggled with. That over-politicized leaders from all sides have been filibustering the bigger solution.
"Most Powerful" Political Literature
The phrase, which begins: “We the People of the United States of America, in order to form a more perfect union,” says Moyers, is “the most powerful statement in the history of political literature.”
I've been pondering what the former PBS journalist means (His new "Moyers & Company" will begin airing on TPT Channel 2, Jan. 29).
People, collaboration, union.
All are essential for deliberation and decision in our democracy. Without difference, there’s no debate. Without debate, no need for representative parties. No cross-party collaboration, no democracy. Without democracy the U.S.-style civilization we’ve sought since our founding ceases to exist.
It makes sense. But it's not simple, as evidenced by how blurred rhetoric and national realities like the recession have decelerated U.S. success.
Toxic doses of ideologies have sliced an intercontinental divide between connective common ground and separatist self-interests. Drawing and quartering our nation in endless directions from North to South, Atlantic to Pacific. And, equally as many here in Dakota County, it seems.
Increasingly disparate streams of strategy—some well intended, others not-so-much—barrel headlong in separate directions. We’ve near drowned the very voice our founders spoke and meant to serve as the orienting source of our democracy.
They would be appalled to see terms like "individual" and "citizen" semantically pillaged and ripped apart from "union" and "we." By all three branches of the checks and balances government they designed, no less.
Including both congress and the judiciary charged with defending the non-partisan constitution for all "We the People."
A troubling example is Citizens United, which anoints corporations, among them many in economic bed with global competitors, the uniquely individual rights of "real" citizens even as it manipulates citizens voices and votes.
As if multi-national companies were individual Americans, which they are not.
Giving the Finger to Founding Fathers?
It almost seems like these leaders are giving the finger to our Founders. They are, with flawed logic, asserting that corporate behemoths’ unaccounted for payments for political campaigns could ever "unite" a country shaken from its roots and critically damaged by corporate and political corruption.
Instead of being empowered by reason and responsibility, Americans are victims of something like self-inflicted organized crime. Our country's core character is being violated by the very powers meant to hold it together, including the power of individual people.
But buried beneath the chaos and chasms still lays the structural axis of America's civilization. The center-most place politicians, public institutions and people could converge. This is the crossroads from which America originates and also to where American’s paths must be oriented. Where our civic journey was meant to begin and the end which our means should be directed.
This, I suggest, is where the heart of America (over-claimed as it is) exists. And where Moyers thinks we should focus. “Politics," he notes, "is about trying to create and keep stable civilization.”
Why, I imagine, Moyers punctuated his point with this poetic, profound, coda: “Civilization is but a thin veneer of civility stretched across the passions of the heart of humanity. And it can rip anytime."
We Are Our Civilization.
I’d add every American possesses passions that can help either tear apart or stitch together our country.
To direct our energies to the latter, we must accept our equal capacities for humanness. Ever alert to fragile dynamics that pull us together one moment, the next apart. But also knowing security, stability and survival isn’t achieved by picking away at differences, but rather by putting together intersecting energies.
Interdependence, then, is how the American civilization Moyers speaks of can be strengthened. Like the hearts beating in our chests, our country cannot function without millions of diverse, interwoven, responsive and in-synch connections.
If we seek the well-being of our civilization beyond our partisan passions, we can go beyond surviving each other. We can thrive as different but complementary individuals organized around serving as co-producers of our communities, culture and country.
Where-We're-At Leadership
We can do this by accepting our "where-we’re-at" leadership as stakeholders and stewards equally as much as citizens served by our government. Co-construing our core purposes and principles by directing leaders to them in our election choices.
But, more critically: Co-achieving our civic solutions through active, ongoing non-polarized engagement.
By connecting in spite and even in conjunction with all of our differences to reanimate all parts of our one civil heart. Together turning the tables to divide the forces that undermine our rights to be interdependent co-collaborators in our democracy.
By seeing ourselves as Moyer's describes us: “Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Liberals, Socialists and others,” he says, are “Rich and poor. We the People are white, black, yellow, brown. We the People: Male, female." Moyers means we are every person from the apolitical to the elected.
Its time all who possess a beating heart get theirs pumping in synch with all others who share the same US Constitution.
By serving together in collaboration with and for our Union as—
We: Real people, really united. We as people, right here in our Dakota County community. Beginning right now.
Editor's Note: Want to submit a letter to the editor to Eagan Patch? Email david.henke@patch.com.
Paul
2:07 am on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Partisan Party Politics is bridgeable & good for our Union. But Moyers & Grazzini miss a crucial point: "We the People" didn't even exist until the Founding Fathers led patriots through 8 war years. Patriot & Torry views were ideological incompatibilities, well beyond mere partisan politics. One, or the other, had to go before “We the People” could forge even imperfect compromises to ‘establish a more perfect union’. Today’s world views are again ideological, not political.
The one view is socialists who believe government is the main solution, such as keeping international corporations in check. They seek ‘penumbras’ and international law with which to selectively alter our Constitution towards ever bigger government.
The other view is conservatives who assess government must be minimal because it trends into uncheckable tyranny, and is already stifling ‘unalienable rights’ it’s supposed to protect. They use the Founding Fathers’ own words to urge a return to a Constitutional Rule of Law under a sharply limited government.
One view believes government needs ever more control. The other view assesses government must shrink back to something John Adams or Thomas Jefferson would recognize. These diametrically opposed ideologies cannot "pump in synch".
Besides this, “We the People” meant a resolve for minimalist government, not a call to impossible cooperation between irreconcilable views. Let's not pervert history to advance ideology.
Andrea Morisette Grazzini
10:25 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Keeping corporations in check is far from a socialist-only theme. Indeed, it's key to USA Patriot Act regulations instituted by Republican president George W. Bush. Features:
To: "(S)trengthen U.S. measures to prevent, detect and prosecute international money laundering and financing of terrorism;
"(S)ubject to special scrutiny foreign jurisdictions, foreign financial institutions, and classes of international transactions or types of accounts that are susceptible to criminal abuse;
"(R)equire all appropriate elements of the financial services industry to report potential money laundering;
"(S)trengthen measures to prevent use of the U.S. financial system for personal gain by corrupt foreign officials and facilitate repatriation of stolen assets to the citizens of countries to whom such assets belong."
And, We the People ideals extend far further in history then our comparatively youthful Country. Including to the Roman Empire. (Which didn't do so well, either.) Closer to home, the Founders borrowed heavily from the Iroquois Confederacy for the framing of participatory democracy We the People represents.
That said, you're correct:
Diametrically opposed views can't pump in synch. But, people who work hard in sincere effort for our Country, could. The Founders' point was a call for just such 'reconcilable cooperation.'
Did the Founders think it would be easy? No. Did they desire it for our Country? Yes. Q is: are We the People up to it?
Andrea
Ken in MN
7:40 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Uh, yeah, about Adams and Jefferson not recognizing. They would be shocked to find that transnational corporations dominate politics once again. The original Tea Party was a revolt against the political and economic power of the East India Company and its hold over the Crown! (Sound familiar?) Also, this comic book-version of what Socalism is all about enables the anti-socials to rationalize away a basic truth about humanity elicidated by John Donne: No man is an island. People don't magically appear out of the ether! It takes other people to make people. We depend on other people providing for our most basic needs to see us to adulthood. Other people have to teach us 99.999% of what we learn, which is all based on the works of other people. Even if we are lucky enough to discover something that is actually new, it would completely lack any context or ability to convey without a foundation of understanding and a frame of reference provided by others. "Rugged Individualism" is a myth forced on us by people who have profitted from interdependence, but now want to absolve themselve of any responsibilty for their fellow humans. Which leads to another basic truth about life: You either pay now, or you pay later. Nobody, IMHO, illustrated this better than Aldous Huxley in A Brave New World. When the lucky Alphas start believing their own hype, and start ignoring the needs of the lower classes, all hell eventually breaks loose...
Andrea Morisette Grazzini
12:37 am on Friday, February 3, 2012
John Brandl, a MN legislator known for his persistent quest for cross-partisan common ground cooperation comes to mind. Brandl, an economist by education and DOD leader in Lyndon Johnson's Admin was deeply respected for bridging political and civic perspectives. He did not play to party (either).
Each February local conservative and progressive Think Tanks (Caux Round Table, Ctr of American Experiment, Growth & Justice, Citizens League, MN Free Market Institute, MN Council of Churches, and Transform Minnesota) co-host an "odd-bedfellows" event in memory of Brandl.
This years discussion will focus on restoring public civility.
Lets hope it develops even more compelling and constructive solutions than last years dialogue. Which I wrote about in a piece called "Bi-Partisan Proof: Rage Rhetoric is Out."
(You can find the essay here:
http://dynamicshift.org/archives/bi-partisan-proof-rage-rhetoric-is-out).
Andrea
Andrea Morisette Grazzini
5:08 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
The head of NASA and a local businesswoman today announced their remarkable and productive government/business and education partnership in Seattle and with this co-authored piece:
http://dynamicshift.org/archives/big-boy-nasa-and-small-girl-led-biz-launch-jobs
NASA and small manufacturer Darlene Miller's Permac are engaging a “Right Skills Now” initiative with local community and technical colleges to offer students high-tech education and paid apprentices, while providing NASA and US businesses a local workforce on equal par with global competitors.
A very good model of how "Big Gov + Small Business" cooperation can work for all.
Andrea